Leafs Should Pursue Gomez, Daze

This is just a thought NOT a rumor so take it as you wish.

First of all I’d like to say that I am satisfied with was has taken place this offseason in leafland.

However, if JFJ thinks like a lot of leafs nation he should be ltrying to aquire a top teir offensize winger to play with Mats Sundin, and who better than Scott Gomez an extremly talented playmaker that is going through a dispute with the Devils. Gomez and Sundin would be a lethal combo with Sundins scoring ability and Gomez playmaking skill.

Again this is just a thought and it is extremely unlikely but maybe JFJ can try to package a sign and trade deal that looks like this:

To Toronto:

F Scott Gomez

F Niclas Bergfors (Excellent Prospect)

**look him up

To New Jersey:

G Mikeal Tellqvist

D Staffan Kronwall

F Alex Steen or Darcy Tucker

1st Round Pick

I am realistic so I don’t expect anything of the sort to happen however, if nothing can be done to aquire a winger to help Mats via trade…then leafs should consider signing Eric Daze to a one year deal. This is of course if he passes a physical and is willing to play for a base salary less than $1 Million. Daze is a huge risk but he posseses some serious offensive talent and, I am not the only one who thinks he is still capable of making a large contribution to any team in the NHL.

62 Responses to Leafs Should Pursue Gomez, Daze

  1. 92-93 says:

    and yes-yes, you can continue this juvenile act by combing through my words above and looking for ‘mistakes’ or ‘weak points’ and that is your perogative.

    you can look at what i said and say its arrogant or i feel that i am an intelligent person and that makes me *****y (which it doesnt by the way).

    you can do whatever the heck you want.

    but maybe, just maybe, you can take my words/advice to heart and actually READ and LISTEN to what i am saying.

    or you can just denouce it all right away … but i have a feeling that what i’ve said is going to linger with you for awhile (and no that assumption is not arrogant either). why? because it makes perfect sense. its the same pattern over and over and over again.

    break the cycle mr.word.

  2. the_word says:

    Wow, you think pretty highly of yourself. I critique you because you’re pretencious and condensing.


    “because of whatever self-confidence issues you are dealing with, you see attacking that person (me) and ‘catching them in the act’ as a victory for yourself and as evidence that you are the same level as that person or even superior. “

    reveals more about you than me. To suggest that critizing you mean I have these supposed issues only reveals your arrogance.

    ” when i critique someone, i do not do it for the sake of critiquing…. i dont do it to try to make myself feel superior or make others feel inferior.”

    Actually you this constantly. In fact this very post I’m responding to now is evidence of that (you’re the one who needs to make this personal, in my post I was talking about Steen)

    You’re right this is petty, but you act like I’m the only one argueing semantics as if I’m talking ot myself, that sounds fairly arrogant to me.

  3. 92-93 says:

    boy, did i see that one coming. i even PREDICTED what you were going to say – i.e. 92-93 is sooo arrogant – and you went right ahead and did it.

    To respond to your statement …

    “To suggest that critizing you mean I have these supposed issues only reveals your arrogance.”

    … i just have to restate what i said before: by no means should you stop critiquing what i say … but stop making into an ego-based sport.

    and turning by observations of you right back on me is not that effective by the way.

    i dont mean to make anything personal – i am simply making an observation because i am sick and tired of how juvenile this is getting? ever notice the shape of your posts on your monitor? it starts out ok and then theres an explosion to the right of the screen until, eventually, we have to scrolling the page to the right because it becomes an profoundly dumb exercise of me saying something and then you mis-reading it and then me saying it to you in 10 diffrent ways for you to understand it.

    at this point. you are talking to yourself. this purely a sport for you. the equivalent of whipping out our respective penis’ and comparing their size. there really isnt that much of a difference. and i am done with it. you have to grow up bud … big time. again, criticize me all you want, but do it in a more effective and mature manner … you’ll find you get a lot more out of these kinds of threads and posts.

  4. the_word says:

    Lol, repond to yourself a few more times, this is you beating your chest and your pseudo alpha male issues.

  5. the_word says:

    Good for you, you can predict the results of your own actions. You act like an A sshole and get called on it. You make this juvenile, you’re so arrogant that you feel your beyond response or criticized (how dare you be questioned). You’re the one who turned this into a personal attack. Its funny that you think I’m talking to myself because you’ll respond to this in oh say four minutes.

  6. 92-93 says:

    again, you taking precisely what i have said about you and turning it on me. by doing this you are NOT addressing your own issues.

  7. 92-93 says:

    youre right.

    once again, at this point you are talking to yourself.

  8. the_word says:

    Break the cycle? You’re pathetic, you write a personal attack and attempt to take away your oppentents ability to call you on your shit. So its fine for you to make BS accusations but its not ok to repond to them. Again thats seems to work in your favor, isolate anything I have to say to suit your end. The reason I gave up calling you a sophist it because you get off on these pleonexic cycles, yet you pretend that you’re above it.

  9. the_word says:

    My issue is you and your BS. I can see what you wouldn’t want to address that.

  10. 92-93 says:


    i think i’ve touched a nerve with you no?

    regardless of whether you take what i’ve said to heart or not, i am pretty sure you’ll do this over and over again – just as you’ve have done with me an others on this site countless times.

    its really not my problem though and whether you choose to address the way you communicate with others is really up to you.

    respond to this if you must but at this point, its pretty pointless and you would be indeed talking to yourself.

  11. 92-93 says:

    how have i taken your ability to criticize me away from you?

    you have the right and you use it. i havent said ‘stop criticizing me’ – i’ve critiqued the WAY you criticize. big difference.

    criticize all you want … and believe it or not, i do take what others say and i do consider them … but the medium is important too … and that is my focus here. i disagreed with your initial message – sure, but theres not big deal in that. its the way you communicate that seems to be quite juvenile, despite your calculating, vulcan-esque rhetoric.

  12. baltic_thunder says:

    …in a heartbeat. Gionta would so fit in.

Leave a Reply