Comments on: Should Some Players Wear Diapers?

By: leaf4ever

leaf4ever — Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:13:58 +0000

First of all, yes I will admit. I believe that both suspensions were deserved.

First to start off with Sundin. I can see why he threw the stick. No because he was being stupid. Yes it was a stupid move, but it was also a goal. Not just another shot on net. But he was in the perfect postion for a goal. Another thing is, he did not turn around and bad mouth the NHL he realized that he did something wrong and was apolegitic for his actions. He took full responsibility. Everyone knows, whether you love him or hate him, that Sundin is not a player that would delibrately try to injure another player or a fan. He's not dirty, in any way. It was a move in frustration and he dealt with the consequence. But in the end, the fan did get $600 and another one got a signed stick. So how bad was it for the fan, really?

As for Roenick. As much as I don't like the guy he had a point. His face was gushing out blood and the refs. do not notice. They don't think, hey mabye he was high sticked? And his comments, he is right on the bacll. WAKE UP NHL What is this now? How many more high sticks have to happen? How many players have to have eye surgery? Lik c'mon. Look at Nolan, out for four weeks. Look at Tucker. Did you see Roenick's face? Brian Berard! He almost lost an eye because of a high stick. I agree with Roenick completely. Wake up NHL, wake up.

By: wingsfan13

wingsfan13 — Sun, 18 Jan 2004 20:18:41 +0000

horrible post. the worst ive seen in a while. number the nhl is in a poor state of mind rite now all the nhl adminstrators are ignoring the problems. number to they are fed up number three are u in the nhl, didnt think so and finally number for these comments are just plain stupid.

By: Bretzky

Bretzky — Sun, 18 Jan 2004 17:32:21 +0000

LMAO. Oh god, its pointless.

"The difference between you and me, is that if I don't agree with someone I don't go and start throwing insults at that person like a ignorant jerk."

Got hypocrisy? Ahahahahaha.

By: Wills

Wills — Sun, 18 Jan 2004 17:21:34 +0000

Everything you addressed sounded like something that came from a dumb angry fan who hates the refs. (why do I have the feeling that your a Ranger fan) I can only repeat myself so many times. If you don’t get what I’m saying or don’t agree, thats your problem. The difference between you and me, is that if I don’t agree with someone I don’t go and start throwing insults at that person like a ignorant jerk. Not that it bothers me but it makes you look like a clown.

By: Bretzky

Bretzky — Sun, 18 Jan 2004 14:29:22 +0000

a) ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, you've proven my point again. thanks.

b) who's angry lol? i'm the one who said i was laughing the whole time and would continue to laugh? what about that denotes anger?

c) You didn't respond to any of the things I addressed in my post. You just avoided your mistakes and started this cycle of "your comments are too stupid for me tee hee hee" instead of trying to defend anything you said. at least when Leaf_Expert responds to me he stands behind what he said.

By: Wills

Wills — Sun, 18 Jan 2004 12:14:51 +0000

I’m not joking, your comments are really that stupid, its funny that you can’t realize it. It makes me laugh that you can get so angry over something so small. Tiny brains can only do so much. Maybe you were to dumb to see it, but I did respond yo your post, try using that little brain to figure it out.

By: Bretzky

Bretzky — Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:17:03 +0000

Read my post moron. Obviously talking about it calmly with the league and trying to get something done about it went ABSOLUTELY NOWHERE. The officiating has only continued to get severely worse. So what else does a player have to do? Roenick admitted that what he did was a little bit of testosterone taking over, but he still stands by what he did because he’s right. The refs are paid to do a job. Lately they’ve been missing major, obvious calls and the players are getting frustrated. Roenick has succeeded in causing a big controversy by doing what he did, and now more than ever the issue is in the media. So how is what he did the wrong way? Class? None of you morons have any of that. How would you know what it is? As for your “edit half of what he said to make it appropriate for TV” ….. Have you ever watched a hockey game before? Players curse all the time, sometimes it doesnt even get editted out because it’s live. Why are you whining? May I suggest Jergen’s Baby Shampoo? NO MORE TEARS.

By: Bretzky

Bretzky — Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:13:03 +0000

LOL. OMG A UNIVERSITY HONORS STUDENT. I could brag about myself too but I don’t need to because I’m already on top. You keep saying stuff like “your comments are so stupid I can’t even comment on them!”… but you don’t back up ANYTHING you say. And where are your rebuttles to what I said? Nowhere to be found because you’re dead wrong. “Death ears” ahahahahaha. Some University Honors student! What University would that be? Lmao. You’re pathetic, so until you actually respond to what I said instead of just blandly saying that my comments are too stupid to respond to, I’ll keep laughing. There’s nothing more I can say. You argue the same point that I picked apart piece by piece already and you ignore that completely. Did you READ my post? Read it slowly. Make sure you absorb all of it. Genius. lmao.

By: d_only_Flames_Fan

d_only_Flames_Fan — Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:57:12 +0000

yeah, that was a good one. I was trying to think where i heard that.

By: devfanman4

devfanman4 — Sun, 18 Jan 2004 00:43:46 +0000

How is what he did and said about the officiating classy? He threw a waterbottle. By the time you're about 4 or 5, you learn that temper tantrums don't get you what you want. When they interviewed him after the game they had to edit half of what he said to make it appropriate for TV! Now that was classy!

He had a case against the referees, but he went about it the wrong way.