Comments on: Where would the Leafs be without Kessel?

By: Boston_Bruins

Boston_Bruins — Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:35:35 +0000

You mean until Boston starts one now?

By: reinjosh

reinjosh — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:20:25 +0000

Keep taking shit out your assing and not backing it up. You haven't provided one, not ONE, piece of evidence suggesting Kadri deserves it any less. Weak my friend. Weak.

By: hockey_lover

hockey_lover — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:11:11 +0000

That Id agree with for sure. There are a few teams that fall into that.

By: leafmeister

leafmeister — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:44:31 +0000

Fair enough. I guess a modern take on a dynasty is what I meant. Like Pittsburgh and Chicago; not going to win every year, but have enough core pieces locked up to contend for their division and make a run every 3 or so years.

By: hockey_lover

hockey_lover — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:06:55 +0000

No such thing as dynasties anymore man. Detroit was the last one to pull it off and it started well before the cap. With the cap in place, dynasties are a thing of the past.

By: dumbassdoorman

dumbassdoorman — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:13:06 +0000

Yes Ryan is a very good player, but Weber is the best dman in the league, PERIOD!

By: TheLeafNation91

TheLeafNation91 — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:06:31 +0000

I would to...MSP has not looked good at all in the NHL but he atleast was a high pick.

I would trade Blacker and Franson for MSP.

By: TheLeafNation91

TheLeafNation91 — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:05:04 +0000

No way. It would most likely cost Bobby Ryan and Schultz for Weber

It will be contingent on Weber signing.

Let's not forget Ryan is a very very very good player.

By: dumbassdoorman

dumbassdoorman — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:46:27 +0000

I would do MSP for Franson

By: dumbassdoorman

dumbassdoorman — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:45:16 +0000

Ana. would want to sign him before giving up Bobby Ryan, which means, the Preds would be getting more than just him back. I could see Ryan, Schultz and and 1st for Weber, maybe even more?