Comments on: Big Winners And Big Losers
NHL - Hockey Trade Rumors, providing NHL Hockey Trade Rumors since 1996Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:35:58 +0000hourly1By: Byzz33
Thu, 04 Mar 2004 13:20:19 +0000http://localhost/wordpress24/?p=8126#comment-85419Excellent article; I agree on every points. Of course, we’ll see how good will be all the prospects and draft picks involved. For those bashers complaining about this early review, well, repeat after me: short-term-analysis.
Thu, 04 Mar 2004 03:46:28 +0000http://localhost/wordpress24/?p=8126#comment-85418I dont agree with the Burke-Comrie trade. Burke is a #1 goalie anywhere he goes. What would you rather have: a #1 goalie or a top 6 forward? Eager is got a very bright future, he’s got potential up the ass. Philly won that trade.
Thu, 04 Mar 2004 02:18:17 +0000http://localhost/wordpress24/?p=8126#comment-85417What is the point of this article exactly? “This team won this deal because they got the best player.” If you didn’t know that, then you shouldn’t be talking about hockey! Don’t get me wrong Wills, I know the idea was nice, but after you sized up all the deals and realized the team with the best player won every deal, you should have scrapped the article. Phoenix probably does win that deal, but they overpayed for Comrie. Eager and Rado should have returned Phoenix Jimmy Vandermeer or AT LEAST a second rounder.