    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crucial time in Burke&#8217;s tenure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeytraderumors.com/crucial-time-in-burkes-tenure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/crucial-time-in-burkes-tenure/</link>
	<description>NHL  - Hockey Trade Rumors, providing NHL Hockey Trade Rumors since 1996</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: mojo19</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/crucial-time-in-burkes-tenure/comment-page-1/#comment-363863</link>
		<dc:creator>mojo19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23438#comment-363863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grabovski, Biggs, Bozak and Blacker For Kane and Antropov. Threw in Bozak for Antro to save Jets $]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grabovski, Biggs, Bozak and Blacker For Kane and Antropov. Threw in Bozak for Antro to save Jets $</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schneidfeld</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/crucial-time-in-burkes-tenure/comment-page-1/#comment-363825</link>
		<dc:creator>Schneidfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23438#comment-363825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jets want offense, a top 6 forward.  If TO wanted Kane, they&#039;d likely be giving up several players (Grabo &amp; another roster player or high prospect) to get him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jets want offense, a top 6 forward.  If TO wanted Kane, they&#8217;d likely be giving up several players (Grabo &amp; another roster player or high prospect) to get him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toronto77</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/crucial-time-in-burkes-tenure/comment-page-1/#comment-363793</link>
		<dc:creator>toronto77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23438#comment-363793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Gal/Grig and Fors are all gone by the 5th, than I may consider the Duchene trade.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Gal/Grig and Fors are all gone by the 5th, than I may consider the Duchene trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toronto77</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/crucial-time-in-burkes-tenure/comment-page-1/#comment-363792</link>
		<dc:creator>toronto77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23438#comment-363792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know if I would go as far to say that Duchene will be better than Gal or Grig, it&#039;s a tight race.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if I would go as far to say that Duchene will be better than Gal or Grig, it&#8217;s a tight race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoelesshobo</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/crucial-time-in-burkes-tenure/comment-page-1/#comment-363780</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoelesshobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23438#comment-363780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peg has a good starting cast on D.

- Buff
- Enstrom 
- Bogo

If anything they would be looking for a solid two way or defesive minded D man think Schenn and to a lesser extent Holzer may hold some value.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peg has a good starting cast on D.</p>
<p>- Buff<br />
- Enstrom<br />
- Bogo</p>
<p>If anything they would be looking for a solid two way or defesive minded D man think Schenn and to a lesser extent Holzer may hold some value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoelesshobo</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/crucial-time-in-burkes-tenure/comment-page-1/#comment-363779</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoelesshobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23438#comment-363779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Made me lol as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Made me lol as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blaze</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/crucial-time-in-burkes-tenure/comment-page-1/#comment-363777</link>
		<dc:creator>blaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23438#comment-363777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How&#039;s the D in the peg how about a dman? Franson or Gunnarson instead Of he prospect. I&#039;d do that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s the D in the peg how about a dman? Franson or Gunnarson instead Of he prospect. I&#8217;d do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dumbassdoorman</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/crucial-time-in-burkes-tenure/comment-page-1/#comment-363776</link>
		<dc:creator>dumbassdoorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23438#comment-363776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Basically the way I see it is if we can&#039;t trade up to the two spot and grab Gal, then we need to eith trade back and aquire mor assets like two 1sts, or trade it for an established player. It is time to shit or get off the pot and I think Burke knows it. drafting anyone but him is a waste of time as they will be good but not impact type players, if other teams are enamoured then let them take the pick. I would be highly disappointed if we draft reinhart say, even though I like him as a player]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically the way I see it is if we can&#8217;t trade up to the two spot and grab Gal, then we need to eith trade back and aquire mor assets like two 1sts, or trade it for an established player. It is time to shit or get off the pot and I think Burke knows it. drafting anyone but him is a waste of time as they will be good but not impact type players, if other teams are enamoured then let them take the pick. I would be highly disappointed if we draft reinhart say, even though I like him as a player</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoelLeafs</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/crucial-time-in-burkes-tenure/comment-page-1/#comment-363775</link>
		<dc:creator>JoelLeafs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23438#comment-363775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[heh, good joke.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh, good joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schneidfeld</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/crucial-time-in-burkes-tenure/comment-page-1/#comment-363774</link>
		<dc:creator>Schneidfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23438#comment-363774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For sure, top center is top priority for Leafs, but doesn&#039;t mean they won&#039;t look to upgrade elsewhere, and let&#039;s be honest, the Leafs could use upgrades in every position.  

I think the price may be steeper for Kane than what we&#039;re talking about here, now that I&#039;ve thought about it more.  He&#039;s improved every season he&#039;s played in the NHL, and is coming off of a 30 goal season at the young age of 22.  Not saying he&#039;s untouchable, but thinking now that the 5th plus Army/Lombardi might not be enough, might have to throw in a good prospect too (Frattin, Kadri, etc) to get a player as good as Kane.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For sure, top center is top priority for Leafs, but doesn&#8217;t mean they won&#8217;t look to upgrade elsewhere, and let&#8217;s be honest, the Leafs could use upgrades in every position.  </p>
<p>I think the price may be steeper for Kane than what we&#8217;re talking about here, now that I&#8217;ve thought about it more.  He&#8217;s improved every season he&#8217;s played in the NHL, and is coming off of a 30 goal season at the young age of 22.  Not saying he&#8217;s untouchable, but thinking now that the 5th plus Army/Lombardi might not be enough, might have to throw in a good prospect too (Frattin, Kadri, etc) to get a player as good as Kane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
