    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTR New Design &#8211; Options that you would like to see</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeytraderumors.com/htr-new-design-options-that-you-would-like-to-see/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/htr-new-design-options-that-you-would-like-to-see/</link>
	<description>NHL  - Hockey Trade Rumors, providing NHL Hockey Trade Rumors since 1996</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 03:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Man</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/htr-new-design-options-that-you-would-like-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-363394</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=20990#comment-363394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well i see what you are saying ... but ... if a word matches the censorship list then it goes directly to me. I ten i have to approve it or delete it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i see what you are saying &#8230; but &#8230; if a word matches the censorship list then it goes directly to me. I ten i have to approve it or delete it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LN91</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/htr-new-design-options-that-you-would-like-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-363342</link>
		<dc:creator>LN91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=20990#comment-363342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[-_-]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-_-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LN91</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/htr-new-design-options-that-you-would-like-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-363341</link>
		<dc:creator>LN91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=20990#comment-363341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do you always say a top asset? None of those guys mentioned are top assets? Top assets are very good blue chip prospects that could be first-liners or top-pairing defencemen?

None of those guys will probably be at that level...And drafting Faksa at the fifth position, will most likely add to a prospect full of talented secondary talent.

Why not use one of them...And your fifth overall pick...To acaquire a player that has been compared to Marian Hossa or Ron Francis?

It makes perfect sense for me. Hell, LA traded more than Schenn and Simmonds for Mike Richards...But LA acquired a need and look at them now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you always say a top asset? None of those guys mentioned are top assets? Top assets are very good blue chip prospects that could be first-liners or top-pairing defencemen?</p>
<p>None of those guys will probably be at that level&#8230;And drafting Faksa at the fifth position, will most likely add to a prospect full of talented secondary talent.</p>
<p>Why not use one of them&#8230;And your fifth overall pick&#8230;To acaquire a player that has been compared to Marian Hossa or Ron Francis?</p>
<p>It makes perfect sense for me. Hell, LA traded more than Schenn and Simmonds for Mike Richards&#8230;But LA acquired a need and look at them now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nordiques100</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/htr-new-design-options-that-you-would-like-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-363338</link>
		<dc:creator>nordiques100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=20990#comment-363338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Subban could slip to 35th overall. 

I really like him. And he would eventually add more spice to the Habs/Leafs clash. 

He&#039;s a very talented goalie. He&#039;s a real goalie. one who uses talent, plus technique. Not just a blocker. He definitely needs to sharpen up, but, I think it would be nice to have a ultra competitive, confident guy back there. 

Ya maybe too early for 19, but worthy of a high selection somewhere in the first two rounds.

Tanner Pearson or Matteau could be there too at 35. Thomas Wilson is also someone who Toronto could take at 19.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subban could slip to 35th overall. </p>
<p>I really like him. And he would eventually add more spice to the Habs/Leafs clash. </p>
<p>He&#8217;s a very talented goalie. He&#8217;s a real goalie. one who uses talent, plus technique. Not just a blocker. He definitely needs to sharpen up, but, I think it would be nice to have a ultra competitive, confident guy back there. </p>
<p>Ya maybe too early for 19, but worthy of a high selection somewhere in the first two rounds.</p>
<p>Tanner Pearson or Matteau could be there too at 35. Thomas Wilson is also someone who Toronto could take at 19.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reinjosh</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/htr-new-design-options-that-you-would-like-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-363335</link>
		<dc:creator>reinjosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=20990#comment-363335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d be cool with the 10th and 19th picks for the 5th, maybe with a 3rd or later 2nd also if we can swindle them.  I think it&#039;s plausible that Faksa could be there too. I am a little concerned about how his playoffs were though, but if the big 2 Russians and the American of Russian descent (he&#039;s not Russian, sorry big pet peeve of mine with him. Not sure why, but it just annoys me). 

I&#039;d personally shoot for a dman with the 2nd pick. I&#039;d love to get one of Koekkoek or Ceci if they are available. Gaunce would be cool too though. 

I&#039;m not a fan of taking a goalie. I just don&#039;t see value in taking them in the first round. I&#039;d rather draft one late like we did with Sparks last year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be cool with the 10th and 19th picks for the 5th, maybe with a 3rd or later 2nd also if we can swindle them.  I think it&#8217;s plausible that Faksa could be there too. I am a little concerned about how his playoffs were though, but if the big 2 Russians and the American of Russian descent (he&#8217;s not Russian, sorry big pet peeve of mine with him. Not sure why, but it just annoys me). </p>
<p>I&#8217;d personally shoot for a dman with the 2nd pick. I&#8217;d love to get one of Koekkoek or Ceci if they are available. Gaunce would be cool too though. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of taking a goalie. I just don&#8217;t see value in taking them in the first round. I&#8217;d rather draft one late like we did with Sparks last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reinjosh</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/htr-new-design-options-that-you-would-like-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-363334</link>
		<dc:creator>reinjosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=20990#comment-363334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hehe I liked the last line.

And I agree. If it&#039;s bad, moderate it after, not before. It just slows stuff down. Moderate articles, fine. But not comments, until afterwards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe I liked the last line.</p>
<p>And I agree. If it&#8217;s bad, moderate it after, not before. It just slows stuff down. Moderate articles, fine. But not comments, until afterwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nordiques100</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/htr-new-design-options-that-you-would-like-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-363333</link>
		<dc:creator>nordiques100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=20990#comment-363333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[for me, it has to be one of the 3 Russians (technically Galenchuk is American but lets count him as a Russian here) or else Forsberg.

But to me, Forsberg is same as Faska and I rather have Faska just because he is a centre. and a big centre no less. And there isnt much point in picking him at 5 when he could possibly be had at 6-10. 

The only time Murray makes sense if there are deals made already by Toronto to fill holes up front moving the likes of Schenn and Franson.

Murray would be an excellent replacement. He&#039;s not a home run, but I could see him as a Seidenberg kind of player for the next 10 years. Or steady like Redden when he was a Sen. Thats not bad to have a consistent guy in your lineup.

But, the option of moving down, should the Russians be gone, is sensible.

Perhaps the 5th for the 10th and 19th picks of Tampa along with their 3rd rounder or a late 2nd could be a possibility. 

I dont know if Faska would fall there, but Reinhart could be there at 10. 

And Brendan Gaunce could be there at 19, Or they take a shot at Subban. Lots of options, hopefully BB explores them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for me, it has to be one of the 3 Russians (technically Galenchuk is American but lets count him as a Russian here) or else Forsberg.</p>
<p>But to me, Forsberg is same as Faska and I rather have Faska just because he is a centre. and a big centre no less. And there isnt much point in picking him at 5 when he could possibly be had at 6-10. </p>
<p>The only time Murray makes sense if there are deals made already by Toronto to fill holes up front moving the likes of Schenn and Franson.</p>
<p>Murray would be an excellent replacement. He&#8217;s not a home run, but I could see him as a Seidenberg kind of player for the next 10 years. Or steady like Redden when he was a Sen. Thats not bad to have a consistent guy in your lineup.</p>
<p>But, the option of moving down, should the Russians be gone, is sensible.</p>
<p>Perhaps the 5th for the 10th and 19th picks of Tampa along with their 3rd rounder or a late 2nd could be a possibility. </p>
<p>I dont know if Faska would fall there, but Reinhart could be there at 10. </p>
<p>And Brendan Gaunce could be there at 19, Or they take a shot at Subban. Lots of options, hopefully BB explores them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reinjosh</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/htr-new-design-options-that-you-would-like-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-363331</link>
		<dc:creator>reinjosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=20990#comment-363331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d rather have Reinhart than Murray at this point. Reinhart would be a perfect long term replacement for Phaneuf.

Hell, if we could trade back and grab Reinhart than, and maybe trade into the lower top ten and grab Faksa as well (or maybe early teens), I&#039;d consider Draft 2012 a success. Of course if Galchenyuk/Grigorenko fall.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather have Reinhart than Murray at this point. Reinhart would be a perfect long term replacement for Phaneuf.</p>
<p>Hell, if we could trade back and grab Reinhart than, and maybe trade into the lower top ten and grab Faksa as well (or maybe early teens), I&#8217;d consider Draft 2012 a success. Of course if Galchenyuk/Grigorenko fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoelLeafs</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/htr-new-design-options-that-you-would-like-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-363330</link>
		<dc:creator>JoelLeafs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=20990#comment-363330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although, what&#039;s the deal with comments requiring moderation? What&#039;s the risk here? If a comment is so awful that it must be removed, why not do it after the fact? Slowing down how fast posts go up slows down conversation and will divert eyeballs away from the site. 

Censorship is &lt;strike&gt;fucked&lt;/strike&gt; bad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although, what&#8217;s the deal with comments requiring moderation? What&#8217;s the risk here? If a comment is so awful that it must be removed, why not do it after the fact? Slowing down how fast posts go up slows down conversation and will divert eyeballs away from the site. </p>
<p>Censorship is fucked bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoelLeafs</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/htr-new-design-options-that-you-would-like-to-see/comment-page-1/#comment-363326</link>
		<dc:creator>JoelLeafs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=20990#comment-363326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the changes thus far have been great. I agree that more white would be better, but I suppose some people are still running small screen resolutions. maybe throw the ads on the left side and let the comment frames expand to the right with the browser. Should be easy enough if you limit a minimum size but let it expand as much as we want it to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the changes thus far have been great. I agree that more white would be better, but I suppose some people are still running small screen resolutions. maybe throw the ads on the left side and let the comment frames expand to the right with the browser. Should be easy enough if you limit a minimum size but let it expand as much as we want it to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
