Comments on: Leafs give up on Sundin! Armstrong best Leafs Captain Ever!

By: 92-93

92-93 — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:55:48 +0000

you are hopeless. its that simple.

its like speaking to a wall but worse: youre a wall with a serious insecurity and ego problem.

how else can you explain an inability on your part to acknowledge answers and responses that i have given to you? how else to explain your behaviour on other threads where you arrogantly grace us with your presence in a style of argument that is immature at best?

how else can you explain a racist mindset that has been watered down and backpeddled into drivel that has so many holes in it that it is not even funny?

how else can you explain the cut-and-paste type responses that - again - DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE my own respones to your queries?

arrogance, ego, and a very small-minded and low-IQ all explain what we've seen from you in this thread. its all there in black and white.

anyone reading our threads who may even agree with what you are saying (and i believe there are plenty out there who are ignorant enough to agree with the content you spew a la Cherry) ... WOULD STILL BE COMPLETELY BAFFLED by the FORM in which you choose to wrap that content in.

they would see my responses to your answers and then your subsequent responses asking 'where's the answer?!' and wonder if you have sh#t for brains.

By: 92-93

92-93 — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:49:53 +0000

I JUST GAVE YOU THE ANSWER!

A SHORTENED VERSION OF WHAT WAS TYPED (OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN) BUT AN ANSWER NONETHELESS.

YOU HAVE TO BE STUPID, BLIND, OR INCREDIBLY SCARED AND IMMATURE TO NOT HAVE READ OR EVEN ACKNOWLEDGED THE EXISTENCE OF MY ANSWERS TO YOUR QUESTIONS.

By: 92-93

92-93 — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:47:24 +0000

answer (short version – you can do the work and look it up): each of those 5 teams had unique circumstances that had nothing to do with the ethnic makeup of those players. for a more meatier version of that – go back and read for yourself.

By: 92-93

92-93 — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:45:31 +0000

again, easy response:

youve only (after many hours and refining of your comments) stumbled onto the nature-nuture thing, which itself is very problematic.

but INITIALLY - and that is what i am talking about here - you stated blatantly racist comments - not UNIQUE to you.

By: BruMagnus

BruMagnus — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:11:42 +0000

In fact, I searched and searched and found NOTHING of yours posted until after I had repeatedly asked you for an answer. I did the work but it came up with no results, so I wanted to ask you clearly so you could answer again. Sadly you ignored it and made me look for an answer that doesn't exist! Great job.

I'm not lazy, I looked like crazy. I'm not scared. I know you didn't have an answer that was your own ideas. You should have been able to simply repost what it was you supposedly wrote to any of my numerous similar questions, but you never had an answer so you didn't.

By: BruMagnus

BruMagnus — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:10:42 +0000

By: BruMagnus

BruMagnus — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:05:11 +0000

I'm not backpeddling. Once again you misinterpretated what I was saying and don't have the maturity to own up when you are wrong.

In fact, in one of my previous comments, I wrote about nature/nurture, how it's definitely nurture, and I wonder if nature or not (though I doubt it).
I was also OBVIOUSLY talking about NHL leadership as a result of this! But you couldn't think outside the box (something I accuse you of many times).

So really, you've got it all wrong. You've never understood what I was saying and have been putting words in my mouth.

By: BruMagnus

BruMagnus — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:04:08 +0000

In fact, in one of my previous comments, I wrote about nature/nurture, how it's definitely nurture, and I wonder if nature or not (though I doubt it).

So really, you've got it all wrong. You've never understood what I was saying and have been putting words in my mouth.

By: KingCanada

KingCanada — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:28:13 +0000

Im usually pretty good with spelling but for some reason i always mispelle Kaberle (must be the french in me lol)

Anyways Gill is a much better player then Berg buddy, he is our main PK player and he is big and has plenty of reach. Hes a good defensive defenseman. He also has decent numbers. At the same time he is relatively cheap at 2 million, u get what you pay for.

And as for the 3 kids (Welly, Staj and Steen) they ALL have value, their young players with lots of potential, most teams would jump on them if any were available.

By: arigold

arigold — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:24:58 +0000

You are a complete dumbass. You just answered your own question. Canadians are more represented in the NHL than any other country. That is why Canadian captains have such a great record of winning the Stanley Cup you idiot. They do better because they are heavily represented, not because Europeans are incapable of being good Captains. Think about it please.