    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leafs would love to get O&#8217;Reilly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeytraderumors.com/leafs-love-oreilly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/leafs-love-oreilly/</link>
	<description>NHL  - Hockey Trade Rumors, providing NHL Hockey Trade Rumors since 1996</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: toronto77</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/leafs-love-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-369552</link>
		<dc:creator>toronto77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=24674#comment-369552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[even though I am not big on ROR, you do make a good point.  With Kessel as talented as he is, you don&#039;t need a fancy no.1 centre like a Getzlaf to get it done, maybe ROR will be good enough. The leafs could have a top line similar to St.Louis where David Backes is there no.1 centre, I don&#039;t see Backes as a no.1, but he is getting the job done.

The problem is what do you do with Bozak? unless you move Kadri to the wing you can&#039;t really fit Bozak on the third line, you would think he would go back the other way. At least that way the Avs get a centre back and they are both equally as good on the face-offs.

What about:

To Tor: ROR, Johnson

To Col: Bozak, Phaneuf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even though I am not big on ROR, you do make a good point.  With Kessel as talented as he is, you don&#8217;t need a fancy no.1 centre like a Getzlaf to get it done, maybe ROR will be good enough. The leafs could have a top line similar to St.Louis where David Backes is there no.1 centre, I don&#8217;t see Backes as a no.1, but he is getting the job done.</p>
<p>The problem is what do you do with Bozak? unless you move Kadri to the wing you can&#8217;t really fit Bozak on the third line, you would think he would go back the other way. At least that way the Avs get a centre back and they are both equally as good on the face-offs.</p>
<p>What about:</p>
<p>To Tor: ROR, Johnson</p>
<p>To Col: Bozak, Phaneuf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leafmeister</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/leafs-love-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-369549</link>
		<dc:creator>leafmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=24674#comment-369549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was pumped when we got Franson. I think he is gonna be a top 4, and if he doesn&#039;t have a future here, he could garner quite a return I think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was pumped when we got Franson. I think he is gonna be a top 4, and if he doesn&#8217;t have a future here, he could garner quite a return I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leafmeister</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/leafs-love-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-369548</link>
		<dc:creator>leafmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=24674#comment-369548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would be open to moving Grabovski. I actually didn&#039;t care for that signing either. I know we differ on our views of 1st round picks, but I think we would have been better off trading him last deadline and really gone to town on the 2012 draft. I believe teams were offering up 1st rounders. 

I think he is a 2nd line center on a bad team, but on a team that competes, he is too streaky and iffy defensively. I like the fire in his game, but he is too expensive for what he adds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be open to moving Grabovski. I actually didn&#8217;t care for that signing either. I know we differ on our views of 1st round picks, but I think we would have been better off trading him last deadline and really gone to town on the 2012 draft. I believe teams were offering up 1st rounders. </p>
<p>I think he is a 2nd line center on a bad team, but on a team that competes, he is too streaky and iffy defensively. I like the fire in his game, but he is too expensive for what he adds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leafmeister</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/leafs-love-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-369547</link>
		<dc:creator>leafmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=24674#comment-369547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know that Biggs is projected to be a top 6 forward. My understanding was that he was more likely to be a 3rd line banger. If he has that offensive potential then great, but I don&#039;t know that he does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that Biggs is projected to be a top 6 forward. My understanding was that he was more likely to be a 3rd line banger. If he has that offensive potential then great, but I don&#8217;t know that he does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannyLeafs</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/leafs-love-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-369546</link>
		<dc:creator>DannyLeafs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=24674#comment-369546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s much more than a slight upgrade. Offensively he is a slight upgrade, defensively and in terms of puck possession numbers, he is a massive upgrade. I also like ROR&#039;s upside offensively compared to Bozak&#039;s. The list of 20 year olds who have put up 50+ points is impressive, and almost invariably they continue to improve offensively. I don&#039;t think he is a top end offensive talent, but consistent 60-70 pt guy with great defensive ability is a definite possibility, and that would give us first line C production. Also, I don&#039;t think we need our C to be our end all be all offensive dynamo, Kessel has that, I think ROR being responsible and good offensively would be a great fit in the long run.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s much more than a slight upgrade. Offensively he is a slight upgrade, defensively and in terms of puck possession numbers, he is a massive upgrade. I also like ROR&#8217;s upside offensively compared to Bozak&#8217;s. The list of 20 year olds who have put up 50+ points is impressive, and almost invariably they continue to improve offensively. I don&#8217;t think he is a top end offensive talent, but consistent 60-70 pt guy with great defensive ability is a definite possibility, and that would give us first line C production. Also, I don&#8217;t think we need our C to be our end all be all offensive dynamo, Kessel has that, I think ROR being responsible and good offensively would be a great fit in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannyLeafs</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/leafs-love-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-369545</link>
		<dc:creator>DannyLeafs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=24674#comment-369545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately for this type of move though, most agents are advising their players to take deals that pay a little lower in the first year or two and get paid more later to avoid the possibility of big escrow caused by a cap that is well above the true 50/50 revenue sharing point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately for this type of move though, most agents are advising their players to take deals that pay a little lower in the first year or two and get paid more later to avoid the possibility of big escrow caused by a cap that is well above the true 50/50 revenue sharing point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realistic_leafs_fan</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/leafs-love-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-369543</link>
		<dc:creator>realistic_leafs_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=24674#comment-369543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yea, I know Reilly was really only our OWN pick,lol I was more referring to keeping a first rounder for the draft. And yes, we seem screwed either way. Say Anaheim falls off and Toronto is in 6th at the deadline and Murray says give us;
2013 1st, Kessel, Bozak, MacArthur and the return is Getzlaf and Ryan because Anaheim is unsure they can sign Getzlaf...do you do it?:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I know Reilly was really only our OWN pick,lol I was more referring to keeping a first rounder for the draft. And yes, we seem screwed either way. Say Anaheim falls off and Toronto is in 6th at the deadline and Murray says give us;<br />
2013 1st, Kessel, Bozak, MacArthur and the return is Getzlaf and Ryan because Anaheim is unsure they can sign Getzlaf&#8230;do you do it?:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toronto77</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/leafs-love-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-369542</link>
		<dc:creator>toronto77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=24674#comment-369542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ya good point, Eakins is gone after this season I think, an NHL team will snatch him.

For me, Rielly will be in the NHL next season, but Biggs needs to be developed PROPERLY, his upside is huge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya good point, Eakins is gone after this season I think, an NHL team will snatch him.</p>
<p>For me, Rielly will be in the NHL next season, but Biggs needs to be developed PROPERLY, his upside is huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doorman</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/leafs-love-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-369541</link>
		<dc:creator>doorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=24674#comment-369541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually rielly was the only pick of our own used. I understand what ever one is saying but where exactly has trading the firsts got us, lol looks like we are screwed either way!!! Damn]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually rielly was the only pick of our own used. I understand what ever one is saying but where exactly has trading the firsts got us, lol looks like we are screwed either way!!! Damn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realistic_leafs_fan</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/leafs-love-oreilly/comment-page-1/#comment-369540</link>
		<dc:creator>realistic_leafs_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 04:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=24674#comment-369540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[we&#039;ve kept our last 3 first round picks(even traded up once). How many in a row do we have to keep before it is ok to trade one for something that is already NHL proven?(seriously asking, no sarcasm meant) I agree that if the right move doesn&#039;t come along, definitely keep the first rounders. But how many first rounders makes a championship team? I think sometimes we forget how many first rounders are on the leafs...we didn&#039;t draft them, but they are still first round picks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we&#8217;ve kept our last 3 first round picks(even traded up once). How many in a row do we have to keep before it is ok to trade one for something that is already NHL proven?(seriously asking, no sarcasm meant) I agree that if the right move doesn&#8217;t come along, definitely keep the first rounders. But how many first rounders makes a championship team? I think sometimes we forget how many first rounders are on the leafs&#8230;we didn&#8217;t draft them, but they are still first round picks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
