Comments on: Leafs-Rangers News

By: canuck67

canuck67 — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:43:45 +0000

Thats funny how at the start of the season, if anyone said the Leafs lineup sucked you would have thrown a real hissy fit.
Whats changed?

By: Hoondog2

Hoondog2 — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:12:35 +0000

Things are not as bleak in Leaf land as you would like to believe. We’ve actually got a few good prospects coming up. Remember, everything that could have gone wrong this season has – Blake and Tucker way underperforming, Wellwood a no show on the season, injuries, Raycroft proving that he actually is that bad, suspect coaching……Most of these things will be dealt with before next season and we will be back, hopefully with a cupboard full of old and new prospects.

By: KINGSHEW

KINGSHEW — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:08:23 +0000

wellwood kesler and tulsty cannot play on the first line.. dumbass

By: mojo19

mojo19 — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:01:52 +0000

Get your shit straight. I just showed you on that other forum that Kaberle is one of the top scoring d-men over the past 5 years. Meanwhile you just said above that he has only had 1 impressive offensive season. Clearly you're wrong there, and clearly you have no clue what you're talking about.

By: beckfan05

beckfan05 — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:26:37 +0000

It s funny looking back in the archives and seeing how everyone predicted the Queefs to finish anywhere from 5-8 but now they dont have the talent.

Everyone was saying that Wellwood could score 80-100 and that Sundin and Blake should mesh great together. Oh, and dont forget Antropov was supposed to be a super star and you have McCabe and Kubina and Kaberle on D. Stajan was supposed to tear up the league by now along with Panikarosvky and Steen. And dont forget Colaiacovo. We was untouchable.

And Toskala was supposed to complement Raycroft, right?

And Tucker is the supreme enforcer too!

What happened? This is only 6 months ago? Now everyone has turned sour and is saying that the Leafs dont have talent? How come? I though all these guys were supposed to be super stars.

I guess all of you guys are retracting your stand on the Leafs and their talent and are throwing in the towel on these guys? I dont want to hear it next season how these guys are gonna score 100 points each.

Phonies......

By: beckfan05

beckfan05 — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:07:48 +0000

I never said anything about being traded. I said what he shouldnt be traded for. Get you shit straight.

By: habfan1

habfan1 — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:45:39 +0000

atleast you’re mentioning more than one name witch is the smart thing to do incase they don’t get stamkos they could bilt the team around beach

By: LeafsNation91

LeafsNation91 — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:05:46 +0000

Well, the Rangers have talent like the Canucks and unlike the Maple Leafs

Big Difference is you both suck with talent

Unlike the Leafs who suck qith zero talent.

Like seriously, look at Vancouver and NYR's lineup and you would think top in the NHL for sure, with all that talent

Then look at their record and you think, wow they suck.

Leafs lineup looks like shit

And they are in last place where they belong

So thats the BIG DIFFERENCE

Kaberle plays with zero talent, while Roszival plays with alot of it(AKA Jagr, Drury, Gomez, Prucha)

By: arigold

arigold — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:05:26 +0000

I don't think the Rangers are in the market for a dman right now. Sure Kaberle would be a nice addition to any team, but i honestly think they most likely would be looking to shed salary at this point and keep their young players. There are teams that would be after Kaberle, I just dont' think the Rangers are one of them.

By: NHLSlayer

NHLSlayer — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:52:20 +0000

If you're such a dumbass that you are seriously comparing Roszival to Kaberle, you need to unplug your computer from the wall before you put yourself into traction, you inbred son of your sister.

That might be the stupidest comment I've read in the history of HTR, AND THAT'S SAYING A LOT!