    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mega &#8211; Hockey Trade Rumor Update &#8211; June 21, 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeytraderumors.com/mega-hockey-trade-rumor-update-june-21-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/mega-hockey-trade-rumor-update-june-21-2012/</link>
	<description>NHL  - Hockey Trade Rumors, providing NHL Hockey Trade Rumors since 1996</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 03:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoelesshobo</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/mega-hockey-trade-rumor-update-june-21-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-364035</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoelesshobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23479#comment-364035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Liles is healthy he is a force on the PP and in the offensive zone. If he comes back next year like his old self people will soon forget about this trading Liles stuff. I mean he took a pay cut to stay here and people want to trade him away? What are we Philly?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Liles is healthy he is a force on the PP and in the offensive zone. If he comes back next year like his old self people will soon forget about this trading Liles stuff. I mean he took a pay cut to stay here and people want to trade him away? What are we Philly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoelesshobo</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/mega-hockey-trade-rumor-update-june-21-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-364034</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoelesshobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23479#comment-364034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I Understand people want Thomas but when the guy says he wants to take the year off where do you hear. &quot;I will play this year.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Understand people want Thomas but when the guy says he wants to take the year off where do you hear. &#8220;I will play this year.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blaze</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/mega-hockey-trade-rumor-update-june-21-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-363990</link>
		<dc:creator>blaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23479#comment-363990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh and when the Leafs had Liles healthy the PP was deadly, one of the best in the league.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and when the Leafs had Liles healthy the PP was deadly, one of the best in the league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blaze</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/mega-hockey-trade-rumor-update-june-21-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-363989</link>
		<dc:creator>blaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23479#comment-363989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does having Gardiner make Liles redundant? You want only one true puck mover on the team? There is two PP units and both should have a good QB to get things started. At the moment Liles is by far the best on the team at zone entry on the PP.

Assuming we land Shultz which is a big if anyways, that would have to be the youngest D-core in the league. Good luck trying to make the playoffs with that.

Liles brought the type of veteran prescence that the D-core was very very sorely lacking. Pre concussion Liles was a huge part of the Leafs first half success. Likely the best overall defenseman up till his injury.

However if the Leafs land Shultz and run with your hypothetical than that D is too offensively orientated. Only Schenn and Phaneuf could push a guy out of the crease.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does having Gardiner make Liles redundant? You want only one true puck mover on the team? There is two PP units and both should have a good QB to get things started. At the moment Liles is by far the best on the team at zone entry on the PP.</p>
<p>Assuming we land Shultz which is a big if anyways, that would have to be the youngest D-core in the league. Good luck trying to make the playoffs with that.</p>
<p>Liles brought the type of veteran prescence that the D-core was very very sorely lacking. Pre concussion Liles was a huge part of the Leafs first half success. Likely the best overall defenseman up till his injury.</p>
<p>However if the Leafs land Shultz and run with your hypothetical than that D is too offensively orientated. Only Schenn and Phaneuf could push a guy out of the crease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glotz_99</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/mega-hockey-trade-rumor-update-june-21-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-363987</link>
		<dc:creator>glotz_99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23479#comment-363987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well they do need some veteran leadership on defence, so thats probably why they signed liles. 

I think you hold on to Franson unless a good deal comes along, and let Holzner start in the AHL and use him as call up until someone gets injured, which usually doesnt take long.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well they do need some veteran leadership on defence, so thats probably why they signed liles. </p>
<p>I think you hold on to Franson unless a good deal comes along, and let Holzner start in the AHL and use him as call up until someone gets injured, which usually doesnt take long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven_Leafs0</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/mega-hockey-trade-rumor-update-june-21-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-363976</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven_Leafs0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23479#comment-363976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wont be complaining if he tears it up with Kessel at center. Heck it gives Colborne and no.5 pick time to develop and maybe we would end up with 

Parise - ??? - Kessel
??? - Grabovski - Lupul

I would love that. lol.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wont be complaining if he tears it up with Kessel at center. Heck it gives Colborne and no.5 pick time to develop and maybe we would end up with </p>
<p>Parise &#8211; ??? &#8211; Kessel<br />
??? &#8211; Grabovski &#8211; Lupul</p>
<p>I would love that. lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nordiques100</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/mega-hockey-trade-rumor-update-june-21-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-363975</link>
		<dc:creator>nordiques100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23479#comment-363975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if the Leafs can clear enough spots on defence to give space for Schultz should they sign him.

I think that is one of the big things for Schultz, to be guaranteed a roster spot. To be guaranteed ice time and opportunity. 

I think ideally, Toronto opens up enough spots on D to bring him in....but, to fight with Holzer for the 6th defenceman role. 

I have to think if there is amnesty, that&#039;s how Komisarek goes. Otherwise, hopefully they could convince say the Islanders to take him?

Franson? good as gone. even Carlyle benched him for some games. He&#039;d be best served elsewhere. He brings more offence than Schenn, but they are similar. big guys, who dont really move that well.

So that would leave 

Gunnarsson-Phaneuf
Gardiner-Schenn
Liles-Schultz
Holzer

Honestly i think we fans are going to be hating the Liles signing moreso than Grabovski, where there is a ton of people who dislike that signing already. 

I know, obviously at the time, Burke couldn&#039;t predict that Schultz would be possibly available, but he had to have known then that the draft was fairly defence heavy, with the possibility that player could challenge for a job next year. Murray, Reinhart, Dumba, Reilly etc. There are guys here who can provide offence. 

He had to have known Percy and Blacker are going to be at camp challenging for NHL work soon. 

And he had to have seen how well Gardiner played, meaning there was a chance the team already had offence from the defence from him, who comes younger, cheaper and with more potential than Liles. 

So why really did he sign Liles? And Terry Koshan was saying in his Toronto Sun article that Liles is one of the guys who can rest easy knowing they wont be traded. 

Again, not to be a dick and nitpick again on Burke, but again, where&#039;s the planning here? Its too many of the same types of guys again. 

I think Gardiner showed a lot, more than enough to not really need Liles. And I rather keep Franson than Liles. Its not like the PP was all that great to begin with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the Leafs can clear enough spots on defence to give space for Schultz should they sign him.</p>
<p>I think that is one of the big things for Schultz, to be guaranteed a roster spot. To be guaranteed ice time and opportunity. </p>
<p>I think ideally, Toronto opens up enough spots on D to bring him in&#8230;.but, to fight with Holzer for the 6th defenceman role. </p>
<p>I have to think if there is amnesty, that&#8217;s how Komisarek goes. Otherwise, hopefully they could convince say the Islanders to take him?</p>
<p>Franson? good as gone. even Carlyle benched him for some games. He&#8217;d be best served elsewhere. He brings more offence than Schenn, but they are similar. big guys, who dont really move that well.</p>
<p>So that would leave </p>
<p>Gunnarsson-Phaneuf<br />
Gardiner-Schenn<br />
Liles-Schultz<br />
Holzer</p>
<p>Honestly i think we fans are going to be hating the Liles signing moreso than Grabovski, where there is a ton of people who dislike that signing already. </p>
<p>I know, obviously at the time, Burke couldn&#8217;t predict that Schultz would be possibly available, but he had to have known then that the draft was fairly defence heavy, with the possibility that player could challenge for a job next year. Murray, Reinhart, Dumba, Reilly etc. There are guys here who can provide offence. </p>
<p>He had to have known Percy and Blacker are going to be at camp challenging for NHL work soon. </p>
<p>And he had to have seen how well Gardiner played, meaning there was a chance the team already had offence from the defence from him, who comes younger, cheaper and with more potential than Liles. </p>
<p>So why really did he sign Liles? And Terry Koshan was saying in his Toronto Sun article that Liles is one of the guys who can rest easy knowing they wont be traded. </p>
<p>Again, not to be a dick and nitpick again on Burke, but again, where&#8217;s the planning here? Its too many of the same types of guys again. </p>
<p>I think Gardiner showed a lot, more than enough to not really need Liles. And I rather keep Franson than Liles. Its not like the PP was all that great to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thisgamewelose</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/mega-hockey-trade-rumor-update-june-21-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-363971</link>
		<dc:creator>thisgamewelose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23479#comment-363971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, Parise is much better on the wing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Parise is much better on the wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gambo</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/mega-hockey-trade-rumor-update-june-21-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-363964</link>
		<dc:creator>Gambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23479#comment-363964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He&#039;s just saying every big possibility so he can praise himself if one is right.. These are all possible scenarios but i don&#039;t believe anyone is more likely to happen because Eklund said it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s just saying every big possibility so he can praise himself if one is right.. These are all possible scenarios but i don&#8217;t believe anyone is more likely to happen because Eklund said it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schneidfeld</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/mega-hockey-trade-rumor-update-june-21-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-363961</link>
		<dc:creator>Schneidfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23479#comment-363961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaaarrrghhh!!  Why do I read Eklund lol!??!  I know he&#039;s notoriously full of shit, but I can&#039;t help but get excited lol!!!

Parise should be Burke&#039;s #1 target, as a center is our #1 need.  Thomas would be a better fit than Lou for sure, short term gain, but low risk!!  Gives our other goalies a year to develop without the insane pressure.  If we made both those moves, I&#039;d be a very happy boy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaaarrrghhh!!  Why do I read Eklund lol!??!  I know he&#8217;s notoriously full of shit, but I can&#8217;t help but get excited lol!!!</p>
<p>Parise should be Burke&#8217;s #1 target, as a center is our #1 need.  Thomas would be a better fit than Lou for sure, short term gain, but low risk!!  Gives our other goalies a year to develop without the insane pressure.  If we made both those moves, I&#8217;d be a very happy boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
