Comments on: New York Rangers 2005-2006

By: wheresthesoda

wheresthesoda — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:18:12 +0000

dude dont make judgements from one game, and its pre-season, so no one is really giving it there all except the kids that are trying to make a team, and the bruins were.

By: Marky2Fresh

Marky2Fresh — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 11:27:33 +0000

The Ducks and Leafs are definatly better than the BJ’s.

By: wheresthesoda

wheresthesoda — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 22:41:13 +0000

Marcel just scored a goal in his first pre-season game with the Rangers., didnt see the game but i hope he makes the team

By: TrueBlue0917

TrueBlue0917 — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 12:44:36 +0000

Wow The Rangers acquired Marcel Hossa… I hope he turns out to be like his brother Marian, that would be sweet (which i highly doubt.) The rangers gave up Garth murray who was expandable due to the rangers depth of prospects at Center. I remember a few years back when the Rangers wanted to acquire Marcel for Eric Lindros. Sather really loves this guy, but i’m not sure if he will even be with the team this season. Bye Bye garthy

By: chanman

chanman — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:08:52 +0000

That list is totally screwed. Calgary will not even be a # 5 team. Panthers, oilers and preds will not get in the top 10. Stars, kings, sabres and 'yotes deserve better.

Uh,,, yes U R right about the Leafs as well, although overlooking the other 29 names on the list in your blind leaf saturated mind like the fan you are.

By: Mullet

Mullet — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:14:12 +0000

I just received my recent Sports Illustrated issue today and it is the NHL Preview edition and it's pretty ridiculous. Here's how SI rates the teams in the NHL from #1 to #30.

1.Calgary

2.Flyers

3.Sens

4.Lightning

5.Preds

6. Canucks

7.Red Wings

8.Sharks

9.Oilers

10.Panthers

11.Devils.

12.Bruins

13.Pens

14 Blue Jackets

15. Thrashers

16.Blackhawks

17Canadiens

18Avs

19.Isles

20.Leafs

21.Stars

22.Ducks,23.Blues,24.Kings,25.Sabres,26.Wild,27. Coyotes,28.Canes,29.Caps,30.Rangers.

How the hell is Toronto rated #20. In no way are teams like Preds, Tampa, Wings, Panthers, Devils, Jackets, Thrashers, Canadiens, Avs and Isle better then Toronto. Toronto is one hell of a lot stronger and deeper than those teams. Also, the issue is pretty crappy! Doesn't look like they spent much time on it! College sport previews are better then SI's review on hockey.

By: wheresthesoda

wheresthesoda — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:47:37 +0000

you’re damn right jagr is past his prime, but he still is one of the best offensive point producers in the NHL.

By: GretzNYR99

GretzNYR99 — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:45:51 +0000

Yeah, seriously, at least he could have used the right text, and used the word “you’re” to save face and stop from making himself look like the idiot.

By: GretzNYR99

GretzNYR99 — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:40:02 +0000

"Signing leaders like Rucchin is certainly not hindering the development of any of the young players. Most of them are not ready for the NHL at all. A team of young players isn't going to "develop" by losing 7-0 every night with no leadership."

Way to shut that toolbag up.

Completely right, and I couldn't agree more.

Well said, Bretz.

By: intelligentscorpio

intelligentscorpio — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:52:20 +0000

Sather screwed this team good in the past four years, not that they were any better before.
We have to see now how they handle the salary cap and stay competitive?
Jagr is past his prime and they have a lot of youngsters who will take time to mature. Will not be a fun place to play, if Jagr starts whining.