    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NHL EXPECTS TENTATIVE PUCK DROP DATE ON JAN. 19</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeytraderumors.com/nhl-expects-tentative-puck-drop-date-jan-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/nhl-expects-tentative-puck-drop-date-jan-19/</link>
	<description>NHL  - Hockey Trade Rumors, providing NHL Hockey Trade Rumors since 1996</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: leafs_wallace93</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/nhl-expects-tentative-puck-drop-date-jan-19/comment-page-1/#comment-367949</link>
		<dc:creator>leafs_wallace93</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23971#comment-367949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, though I don&#039;t get why is ok to bend on Luongo &#039;cheater&#039; contract.

I think after with &#039;hooray the lockout is over&#039; stuff dies down, the media is going to feast on Burke. A bad year and it could get JFJ ugly. Burke&#039;s gotta either do something big or hope the Leafs just happen to have a great year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, though I don&#8217;t get why is ok to bend on Luongo &#8216;cheater&#8217; contract.</p>
<p>I think after with &#8216;hooray the lockout is over&#8217; stuff dies down, the media is going to feast on Burke. A bad year and it could get JFJ ugly. Burke&#8217;s gotta either do something big or hope the Leafs just happen to have a great year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blaze</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/nhl-expects-tentative-puck-drop-date-jan-19/comment-page-1/#comment-367948</link>
		<dc:creator>blaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23971#comment-367948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought Mac was exactly as advertised last year. Pretty consistant and only lead the team in plus minus. His point totals would&#039;ve been similar to last year if Kulimen didn&#039;t drop off the face of the Earth. I would absolutely not give Mac away but he can be had for a reasonable price.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Mac was exactly as advertised last year. Pretty consistant and only lead the team in plus minus. His point totals would&#8217;ve been similar to last year if Kulimen didn&#8217;t drop off the face of the Earth. I would absolutely not give Mac away but he can be had for a reasonable price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blaze</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/nhl-expects-tentative-puck-drop-date-jan-19/comment-page-1/#comment-367945</link>
		<dc:creator>blaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23971#comment-367945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[However I&#039;d give anything for Benn, the dude bloodied up Iginla. The Leafs don&#039;t need that in their top 6 or anything.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However I&#8217;d give anything for Benn, the dude bloodied up Iginla. The Leafs don&#8217;t need that in their top 6 or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blaze</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/nhl-expects-tentative-puck-drop-date-jan-19/comment-page-1/#comment-367943</link>
		<dc:creator>blaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23971#comment-367943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know Burke and his morals, and to do that to Joe? Never.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know Burke and his morals, and to do that to Joe? Never.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lafleur10</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/nhl-expects-tentative-puck-drop-date-jan-19/comment-page-1/#comment-367938</link>
		<dc:creator>lafleur10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23971#comment-367938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mojo you don&#039;t have the stuff to acquire a player of his caliber .........but yeah he&#039;d be interesting for sure,for many teams,in fact i hope beregvin would look into acquring him as well]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mojo you don&#8217;t have the stuff to acquire a player of his caliber &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;but yeah he&#8217;d be interesting for sure,for many teams,in fact i hope beregvin would look into acquring him as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojo19</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/nhl-expects-tentative-puck-drop-date-jan-19/comment-page-1/#comment-367936</link>
		<dc:creator>mojo19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 04:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23971#comment-367936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[finding loop holes i should have said. word.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>finding loop holes i should have said. word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojo19</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/nhl-expects-tentative-puck-drop-date-jan-19/comment-page-1/#comment-367935</link>
		<dc:creator>mojo19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 04:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23971#comment-367935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well at least they&#039;re balancing out the karma for those teams who thought they were being sneaky with the loop holes.

Also, can&#039;t the NHL just take all draft picks away from New Jersey for the next 5 or 6 years since Lou Lamerello is the guy pretty much responsible for cap loop holes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well at least they&#8217;re balancing out the karma for those teams who thought they were being sneaky with the loop holes.</p>
<p>Also, can&#8217;t the NHL just take all draft picks away from New Jersey for the next 5 or 6 years since Lou Lamerello is the guy pretty much responsible for cap loop holes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 93killer93</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/nhl-expects-tentative-puck-drop-date-jan-19/comment-page-1/#comment-367931</link>
		<dc:creator>93killer93</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 03:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23971#comment-367931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting read. Check out the whole thing. 

http://espn.go.com/blog/nhl/post/_/id/21219/trades-cheat-deals-and-more-cba-details


THE LUONGO RULE 
This is another rule from the league aimed at hammering current back-diving deals (front-loaded, &quot;cheat deals.&quot; However, this has changed from its original form when the NHL first proposed it in October. 

In the original formula, if a player like Roberto Luongo was traded and retired before the end of his deal, the Canucks (the team who signed him to the contract) would assume his remaining $5.33-million cap early hit in retirement. The new rule in this tentative agreement is different. Now, for any contract in excess of six years, both teams involved in a trade on a contract like Luongo’s would be penalized if he retired before the end of his deal. 

To wit: let’s say the Canucks trade Luongo soon. Luongo has played two years of his 12-year contract, the Canucks paying him $16.716 million in salary but only absorbing a $5.33 million cap hit each year. That’s a cap savings of $6.056 million over two years so far for Vancouver. Under this new rule, should the Canucks trade him now and he retires with three years left on his contract, Vancouver would be charged that $6.056 million in cap savings over the final three years left on his deal from 2019 to 2022. However, let’s say for argument’s sake Luongo gets traded to Toronto, the Maple Leafs also would be subject to cap penalties if Luongo retires before the end of his deal. 

To wit, part 2: If Luongo were to play the next seven years of his deal in Toronto before retiring, the Leafs would be paying him $43.666 million in salary but only counting $37.31 million against the cap over those seven years, a cap savings of $6.356 million. So if Luongo retires with three years left on his deal (because his salary falls to $1.618 million in the 10th year and then $1 million in the last two years of the deal), the Leafs would get charged that $6.356 million on their cap spread evenly over the remaining three years of his deal. 

And obviously, if players under these back-diving deals are never traded, but retire before the end of their deals (Marian Hossa in Chicago), their current teams get charged the cap savings spread evenly over the remaining years of the deal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read. Check out the whole thing. </p>
<p>http://espn.go.com/blog/nhl/post/_/id/21219/trades-cheat-deals-and-more-cba-details</p>
<p>THE LUONGO RULE<br />
This is another rule from the league aimed at hammering current back-diving deals (front-loaded, &#8220;cheat deals.&#8221; However, this has changed from its original form when the NHL first proposed it in October. </p>
<p>In the original formula, if a player like Roberto Luongo was traded and retired before the end of his deal, the Canucks (the team who signed him to the contract) would assume his remaining $5.33-million cap early hit in retirement. The new rule in this tentative agreement is different. Now, for any contract in excess of six years, both teams involved in a trade on a contract like Luongo’s would be penalized if he retired before the end of his deal. </p>
<p>To wit: let’s say the Canucks trade Luongo soon. Luongo has played two years of his 12-year contract, the Canucks paying him $16.716 million in salary but only absorbing a $5.33 million cap hit each year. That’s a cap savings of $6.056 million over two years so far for Vancouver. Under this new rule, should the Canucks trade him now and he retires with three years left on his contract, Vancouver would be charged that $6.056 million in cap savings over the final three years left on his deal from 2019 to 2022. However, let’s say for argument’s sake Luongo gets traded to Toronto, the Maple Leafs also would be subject to cap penalties if Luongo retires before the end of his deal. </p>
<p>To wit, part 2: If Luongo were to play the next seven years of his deal in Toronto before retiring, the Leafs would be paying him $43.666 million in salary but only counting $37.31 million against the cap over those seven years, a cap savings of $6.356 million. So if Luongo retires with three years left on his deal (because his salary falls to $1.618 million in the 10th year and then $1 million in the last two years of the deal), the Leafs would get charged that $6.356 million on their cap spread evenly over the remaining three years of his deal. </p>
<p>And obviously, if players under these back-diving deals are never traded, but retire before the end of their deals (Marian Hossa in Chicago), their current teams get charged the cap savings spread evenly over the remaining years of the deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojo19</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/nhl-expects-tentative-puck-drop-date-jan-19/comment-page-1/#comment-367929</link>
		<dc:creator>mojo19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 03:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23971#comment-367929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grabo doesn&#039;t play with Kessel because there isn&#039;t enough pucks for both of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grabo doesn&#8217;t play with Kessel because there isn&#8217;t enough pucks for both of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojo19</title>
		<link>http://hockeytraderumors.com/nhl-expects-tentative-puck-drop-date-jan-19/comment-page-1/#comment-367927</link>
		<dc:creator>mojo19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 23:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeytraderumors.com/?p=23971#comment-367927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ya I would agree, also Svatos is coming out to Panthers camp. He hasn&#039;t been the same since some kind of foot injury or something. 

I don&#039;t mind the Jets team, assuming Byfuglien lost 50 or 60 lbs - 

E.Kane - O.Jokinen - B.Wheeler
A.Ladd - N.Antropov - A.Ponikarovsky
B.Little - A.Burmistrov - K.Wellwood
J.Slater - C.Thorburn - A.Miettinen

D.Byfuglien - T.Enstrom
R.Hainsey - Z.Bogosian
M.Stuart - D.Meech

O.Pavelec
A.Montoya

Looks pretty good. Poni and Jokinen will add some size and depth up front. I don&#039;t see them taking the division unless everything goes right, but they could be a playoff team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya I would agree, also Svatos is coming out to Panthers camp. He hasn&#8217;t been the same since some kind of foot injury or something. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind the Jets team, assuming Byfuglien lost 50 or 60 lbs &#8211; </p>
<p>E.Kane &#8211; O.Jokinen &#8211; B.Wheeler<br />
A.Ladd &#8211; N.Antropov &#8211; A.Ponikarovsky<br />
B.Little &#8211; A.Burmistrov &#8211; K.Wellwood<br />
J.Slater &#8211; C.Thorburn &#8211; A.Miettinen</p>
<p>D.Byfuglien &#8211; T.Enstrom<br />
R.Hainsey &#8211; Z.Bogosian<br />
M.Stuart &#8211; D.Meech</p>
<p>O.Pavelec<br />
A.Montoya</p>
<p>Looks pretty good. Poni and Jokinen will add some size and depth up front. I don&#8217;t see them taking the division unless everything goes right, but they could be a playoff team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
