Comments on: Rumors – Bertuzzi, Skrora, Marleau, Ozolinsh and others

By: badshepard00

badshepard00 — Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:34:26 +0000

The Devils will not pursue Sykora. Lameriollo and Sykora clashed towards the end of his stay in New Jersey hence the fact he was traded all the way out to Anaheim. The Devils should look to move Langenbrunner for a scoring forward within the same price range . Vladamir Malakhov and Daniel McGillis’s bad defense and limited offense has warrented them to be the players traded to free up space for Elias return. I see David Hale stepping up in Malakhovs spot.

By: FLAMESOWNU

FLAMESOWNU — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:19:12 +0000

LOL…wow i thought i was the only one who felt this way..

By: BigCanuck

BigCanuck — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:49:48 +0000

Actually, Cooke would look good on a line with Morrison and Park, If they decided to keep him. Lots of speed and Cooke loves the corners.

By: neilios

neilios — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 01:31:51 +0000

Yes Morrison would get moved to the 2nd line or even traded if they can pick up Marleau to play with Nassy and Bert .I would love to see a trade go down with the Sharks it would help both teams out Sharks would get there stud Dman what they despartly need and Canucks would get a solid Dman in Hannan(BC boy)and a 1st line C what they need so bad that Morrison aint doing crap.This is how the lines would look after the deal.

Nassy Marleau Bert

Sedin Sedin Carter

Goren Morrison Park

Ruttu Linden Green

Salo Hannan

Ohlund Allan

McCarthy Baumgartner

Nabakov and Auld

Not bad 3 lines after the deal if it where to happen 3 solid lines and plus Morrsion can quarterback the powerplay since he would be moved to the 3rd line.

By: Adam_0486

Adam_0486 — Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:45:11 +0000

Marleau would fit perfectly in edmonton because of his smooth skating and the type of fast pace hockey acostume of the Oilers. I thought the guys proposed deal could work Heres why?

1) Marleau makes 4M playing as a 2nd line centre, if Thornton is the go to guy at centre you dont need to be paying another guy 4M to play the same postion. All be it they have a different style of game.

2) When San Jose acquried thornton they traded alot of their depth in stuart and sturm. If they truely want to make a run at the playoffs i suspect they will add some depth. The logical approach to that is making a trade.

3) Although edmonton is in the same conference a trade between the 2 teams isn't impossible i just thouth that sturm replaced by devorak would make sense stat wise. dvorak has 15pts this year sturm has 19pts, dvorak came off a season in 03/04 where he had 50pts (+18) while sturm had 41 (even rating) etc. Then Statios replacing stuart is a stretch but Stuart had 9goals 30assists 39points in 77games while statios had 6goals 22assists 28points in 82 games. On top of the one of two other kids added in the deal, i thought that the made some sense.

By: habs79

habs79 — Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:26:28 +0000

Seriously outscoring Koivu? The Habs true number one center? Dude stop snorting coke. Ribs had 10 more points and played in 13 more games. Koivu is the heart of the team, Ribs would never come back from cancer the same year to play. Ribs plain and simply is a *****, and the only reason he is considered so good, is because he is a french-canadian playing for Montreal. All hockey fans know how much the fans and media in Montreal love french players. We know that’s why Rejean Houle, the worst GM in NHL history kept his job for like 6 years, cause he is french. If Ribs played anywhere else he wouldn’t be so overhyped.

By: JannettyTheRocker

JannettyTheRocker — Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:17:49 +0000

AGAIN YOU POMPOUS IDIOT, this is my opinion and that only. If you don’t agree, then so be it. But quit acting like the only opinion that matters is yours. All I posted was a trade THAT I thought would be pretty fair, and if you read through the responses, not everyone disagreed. So I don’t know what your problem is, maybe you’re dealing with some personal issues or whatever, but don’t *****ing take them out on me………………..And if you don’t like what I post or don’t agree, then fine. But just state why you disagree………..Don’t just make an ASS*HOLE response.

By: BigCanuck

BigCanuck — Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:00:14 +0000

I’m a huge Canuck fan, and I would do that trade in a second, but it might have to be Kaberle instead of Klee.

By: BigCanuck

BigCanuck — Wed, 07 Dec 2005 19:56:28 +0000

Not bad, but I’m a Cooke lover. Maybe throw in a pick instead. I wonder if this would demote Morrison to a different set of wingers? He sure has been sucking this year.

By: BigCanuck

BigCanuck — Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:50:45 +0000

I agree shakrmakr, it would probably take someone like Smyth to get Marleau.

But if it is d the Sharks need, I don't know who the Oil trades.